Approach
Field ecology + experimentation + collaboration
We approach freshwater questions at multiple scales, combining manipulative experiments with field monitoring, laboratory analyses, biological community assessments, GIS, and quantitative analysis. Whenever possible, we work alongside students and conservation partners to develop research that advances ecological understanding while producing information that can be directly applied to freshwater management.
Algae form the energetic foundation of aquatic food webs and play essential roles in nutrient cycling and ecosystem function. However, changes in nutrient availability, temperature, light, hydrology, and other environmental conditions can alter algal communities and, in some systems, contribute to the development of harmful algal blooms (HABs).
Research in the Stoll Lab examines the environmental factors that regulate algal growth, community composition, and cyanotoxin dynamics across freshwater ecosystems. We are particularly interested in understanding why algal communities shift in response to environmental change—and when those shifts result in communities dominated by nuisance or toxin-producing taxa.
Our work spans both benthic and planktonic algal communities and integrates field observations with manipulative experiments and laboratory analyses. Current and future research includes investigating cyanotoxin occurrence in Michigan lakes, identifying physical and chemical drivers of algal community shifts, and evaluating approaches for reducing or treating cyanotoxins.
What environmental conditions drive shifts in freshwater algal community composition?
Why do some lakes experience harmful or toxin-producing blooms while others do not?
How do nutrients interact with temperature, light, and other physical characteristics to influence algal communities?
Where and when are cyanotoxins present in Michigan's inland lakes?
How can our understanding of bloom ecology improve monitoring, management, and treatment of harmful algal blooms?
Harmful algal blooms can disrupt aquatic food webs, threaten fisheries, degrade drinking and recreational water supplies, and expose people and animals to potent cyanotoxins. Understanding the ecological processes that promote blooms—and toxin production within those blooms—is critical for moving beyond simply detecting HABs toward predicting, preventing, and managing them.
The consequences of harmful algal blooms are not experienced equally. While substantial monitoring and research resources are dedicated to HABs in systems such as the Laurentian Great Lakes, far fewer resources are available in many regions where people interact more directly with potentially toxic water. Our research has included work in Lake Victoria, Kenya, where harmful cyanobacterial blooms occur in nearshore waters used extensively by surrounding communities. Limited water-treatment infrastructure and frequent direct contact with lake water can increase the consequences of bloom events and potential cyanotoxin exposure.
By studying harmful algal blooms across diverse freshwater systems—from the Great Lakes region to Lake Victoria—we aim to better understand the environmental conditions that promote harmful and toxin-producing communities while contributing scientific knowledge in places where improved HAB monitoring, prediction, and management can have particularly meaningful ecological and societal benefits.
Coldwater streams are shaped by the interaction of groundwater, surface water, surrounding landscapes, physical habitat, and biological communities. Even relatively small changes in hydrology, temperature, riparian condition, or watershed development can alter habitat for thermally sensitive organisms such as brook trout and many aquatic macroinvertebrates.
Research in the Stoll Lab examines the physical, chemical, and biological processes that create and maintain healthy coldwater stream ecosystems. We are particularly interested in identifying which characteristics allow coldwater communities to persist in increasingly altered landscapes and how that information can be used to prioritize conservation and restoration.
Our approach integrates continuous temperature monitoring, physical habitat assessments, fish and macroinvertebrate communities, riparian vegetation, water quality, hydrology, GIS, and watershed-scale landscape characteristics. By examining these components together, we aim to understand not only whether a stream is impaired, but also why—and which management actions are most likely to improve ecological condition.
We are conducting comprehensive assessments of coldwater streams across Southwest Michigan to identify relationships among physical habitat, thermal conditions, and biological integrity. Field assessments include fish communities, macroinvertebrates, stream habitat, substrate, channel characteristics, riparian condition, and continuous water-temperature monitoring. We are also contributing to the Great Lakes Road-Stream Crossing Inventory.
A major goal of this work is to translate ecological data into data-driven restoration priorities. Rather than applying the same restoration approach everywhere, we want to identify the factors actually constraining ecological condition within individual streams and determine where conservation investments are most likely to produce meaningful ecological benefits.
Small, isolated populations of brook trout persist in coldwater streams throughout Michigan, sometimes within watersheds substantially altered by agriculture, urban development, infrastructure, and other land uses.
We are interested in understanding what allows these remnant populations to persist. By examining stream temperature, groundwater influence, habitat quality, connectivity, surrounding land use, and other environmental characteristics, we aim to identify both vulnerable populations and opportunities for targeted protection.
Ultimately, this work asks an important conservation question: What needs to be protected today to ensure that coldwater species remain on the landscape in the future?
Urban stormwater presents a different challenge for coldwater ecosystems. During warm weather, runoff from roads, parking lots, rooftops, and other impervious surfaces can become substantially warmer than receiving streams.
Bioretention cells are increasingly used to capture and treat this runoff, but their effects on stream temperature remain poorly understood. Our research asks whether bioretention cells mitigate thermal pollution by retaining and cooling stormwater or contribute warm surface-water effluent to receiving coldwater streams during storm events.
By monitoring temperature and hydrologic responses throughout a small coldwater watershed, this work will help determine how green stormwater infrastructure functions within thermally sensitive watersheds and could ultimately inform stormwater design and management practices that better protect coldwater ecosystems.
Groundwater is fundamental to many coldwater streams because groundwater inputs help maintain streamflow and buffer streams against high summer temperatures. Consequently, changes in groundwater availability have the potential to alter both the hydrology and thermal suitability of coldwater habitat.
An emerging direction of our research examines how groundwater withdrawal may influence coldwater stream health and how biological and habitat data can be incorporated into water-management decisions. We are particularly interested in connecting changes in hydrology with ecological responses rather than evaluating water availability solely from a physical perspective.
Beaver Management & Coldwater Stream Ecosystems
Beavers are ecosystem engineers that can substantially alter stream hydrology, geomorphology, temperature, and aquatic habitat. While beaver activity can create valuable habitat and increase ecological complexity, dams can also cause extensive flooding that creates conflicts with roads, infrastructure, private property, and other land uses. These conflicts often result in removal of beavers or their dams, creating a need for management approaches that allow beavers to remain on the landscape while reducing unwanted flooding.
We are evaluating “beaver deceivers” and related flow-control devices as an alternative approach to beaver management in Michigan. These structures are designed to regulate water levels and maintain flow through or around beaver dams, reducing severe flooding without requiring removal of the beavers or complete elimination of the dam.
Our research assesses streams with these management structures by monitoring conditions upstream and downstream of beaver dams through time. We are examining changes in stream substrate and geomorphology, physical habitat, fish communities, and aquatic macroinvertebrate communities to determine how both beaver dams and flow-control structures influence stream ecosystem condition. An important goal is to understand whether the ecological effects of these management approaches differ among stream types. By comparing responses across systems, we can identify where flow-control devices successfully balance flood management with the ecological benefits associated with beaver activity—and where their use may create unintended consequences for stream habitat or biological communities.
Beaver management remains challenging in Michigan because the ecological benefits of beavers must often be balanced against flooding and infrastructure concerns. Removing beavers can eliminate the source of the immediate conflict but also removes an important ecosystem engineer and may substantially alter stream habitat. This research will provide Michigan EGLE with direct, field-based information on how beaver flow-management structures function across different stream settings. By documenting their physical and biological effects through time, our goal is to help determine when and where these approaches are appropriate and potentially support their expanded use as a tool for coexistence with beavers while protecting stream ecosystems and surrounding infrastructure.
What physical and biological characteristics distinguish healthy coldwater streams?
Which habitat characteristics best predict fish and macroinvertebrate community condition?
What allows remnant brook trout populations to persist in altered watersheds?
How important are groundwater inputs for maintaining thermal refugia and summer coldwater habitat?
How does riparian vegetation influence in-stream habitat and thermal condition?
Do bioretention cells reduce or exacerbate thermal pollution during storm events?
How might groundwater withdrawal affect coldwater stream ecosystems?
Which restoration and conservation actions are most likely to produce meaningful ecological improvements?
Can beaver flow-control structures reduce flooding while maintaining the ecological benefits of beaver activity and protecting stream biological communities?
Coldwater streams support ecologically and recreationally important species while providing ecosystem services including water filtration, nutrient processing, and high-quality aquatic habitat. Climate change, groundwater demand, watershed development, habitat degradation, and altered stormwater delivery increasingly threaten these systems.
By identifying the mechanisms that sustain healthy coldwater ecosystems, our goal is to provide conservation organizations, natural resource managers, and decision-makers with information they can use to protect high-quality streams, prioritize restoration, and increase the resilience of coldwater ecosystems to future environmental change.
The availability of essential nutrients is one of the primary controls on biological productivity in aquatic ecosystems. While nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) have received considerable attention in freshwater research, algae require a suite of additional elements—including micronutrients such as iron (Fe) and zinc (Zn)—that can also constrain growth and influence community composition.
Research in the Stoll Lab examines how both macro- and micronutrient availability regulate freshwater algal communities. Rather than focusing solely on changes in algal biomass, we are interested in how nutrient availability influences which organisms thrive, how communities function, and how multiple nutrients interact to produce limitation or co-limitation.
We use manipulative experiments, including nutrient-diffusing substrates and laboratory assays, alongside measurements of algal biomass, community composition, water chemistry, and enzyme activity. This experimental approach allows us to move beyond correlations between nutrients and algal abundance and directly test how individual nutrients influence aquatic communities.
One current project investigates nutrient limitation across seven marl lakes in Michigan's Leelanau region. Marl lakes are characterized by high alkalinity and calcium carbonate concentrations, creating unusual biogeochemical conditions that can reduce phosphorus availability through precipitation and adsorption. Ironically, preliminary results indicate nitrogen as the primary limitating nutrient in these lakes.
Using in-lake nutrient enrichment experiments, we are testing how additions of nitrogen, phosphorus, iron, and zinc influence periphyton growth and community composition across these lakes. We are combining measurements of algal biomass with microscopy and molecular approaches to determine not only whether nutrient additions stimulate growth, but also whether they favor different components of the algal and microbial community.
This work provides an opportunity to examine how the underlying geochemistry of an ecosystem determines biological nutrient demand and may reveal important roles for micronutrients that are frequently overlooked in freshwater monitoring and management.
Aquatic communities are not always limited by a single nutrient. Co-limitation occurs when biological production is constrained by the availability of two or more resources, but the prevalence of co-limitation and the mechanisms that produce it remain important questions in aquatic ecology.
We are conducting a literature synthesis to examine how frequently nutrient co-limitation occurs across aquatic ecosystems and the biological and ecological mechanisms underlying these responses. Of particular interest is distinguishing among different forms of co-limitation and understanding why organisms or communities may respond more strongly to combinations of nutrients than to individual nutrient additions.
Potential mechanisms range from nutrient requirements within individual organisms to differences in nutrient requirements among taxa. For example, one nutrient may directly constrain growth while another limits the production or activity of enzymes needed to acquire that nutrient. At the community level, different taxa may be limited by different resources, creating an apparent co-limitation response when the community is considered as a whole.
By synthesizing evidence across studies, this work aims to move beyond documenting that co-limitation occurs toward understanding why it occurs, under what environmental conditions it is most likely, and what it tells us about the regulation of aquatic ecosystem productivity and community structure.
When are freshwater algal communities limited by N or P, and when do micronutrients become important?
How common is nutrient co-limitation in aquatic ecosystems, and which combinations of nutrients most frequently produce co-limitation?
What biological and ecological mechanisms generate co-limitation responses?
How do Fe and Zn influence algal growth and community composition?
How does nutrient limitation differ among lakes with contrasting water chemistry?
Do nutrient additions change community composition even when changes in total algal biomass are small?
How do nutrient availability and extracellular enzyme activity interact?
Nutrient management has traditionally focused heavily on nitrogen and phosphorus, often with the assumption that ecosystem productivity can be understood through a single limiting nutrient. However, organisms require multiple resources simultaneously, and interactions among nutrients can determine both the magnitude and nature of ecological responses to changing nutrient availability.
Understanding the prevalence and mechanisms of nutrient co-limitation—and the potential roles of frequently overlooked micronutrients—can improve how we conceptualize freshwater productivity, harmful algal blooms, and ecosystem responses to environmental change. This work may also help explain why apparently similar aquatic ecosystems respond very differently to changes in nutrient availability.
Good science is collaborative, and we are always interested in connecting with students, researchers, conservation organizations, natural resource professionals, and community partners who share an interest in freshwater ecosystems.
Students interested in aquatic ecology, freshwater conservation, fisheries, environmental science, or related fields are encouraged to reach out. Research in the Stoll Lab provides opportunities to gain experience in field ecology, experimental design, laboratory methods, biological monitoring, GIS, data analysis, and scientific communication.
Projects may involve joining an existing research effort or developing an independent question that complements the lab's broader research themes. Students do not need to arrive with extensive research experience—curiosity, reliability, a willingness to learn, and genuine interest in freshwater science are much more important.
If you're interested in getting involved, send Dr. Stoll a brief email introducing yourself, describing your research or career interests, and explaining what aspects of the lab's work interest you. Please also include your major, expected graduation year, and any relevant coursework or experience. If you are specifically interested in a M.S. position, propose a few research questions that you would hope to work on as well. GVSU Department of Biology does not offer doctoral degrees.
We welcome collaborations with researchers, conservation organizations, government agencies, watershed groups, Tribal partners, and natural resource professionals working to better understand, manage, and protect freshwater ecosystems.
We are especially interested in partnerships that connect ecological research with real-world environmental questions. This might include identifying research needs, evaluating restoration or management practices, monitoring aquatic ecosystem responses, developing student research projects, or bringing complementary expertise and datasets together to address larger questions.
If you have a freshwater research or management question that overlaps with our work—or an idea that you think we should be thinking about—we'd be happy to hear from you.
LET'S COLLABORATE